Topic: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

The fast development of computer technology and the internet has changed many things in our daily life. We can easily find everything we need, from groceries to cars and everything in between. It can all take place in the blink of an eye, and we take many things for granted which were beyond our imagination 10 years ago.

These modern technologies have changed our life style, but have they also changed our view on art and the art format itself?

Instead of being in front of the easel, spending time painting with brush and oil, pictures can be made using computer software and a mouse in only a few minutes. This can be demonstrated by the potential to allow vast time and labor consuming art work to be simplified and easily produced. An example of this would be the animated cartoon industry, where computer animation is slowly replacing the traditional cell method.

In addition to it’s useful role in film production, one of other advantages of digital art is that it has helped people with little skill, experience, judgment or perspective to create fairly sophisticated-looking and often interesting images. The fact that less training is often required to work in this creative world is one of the reasons that more and more people are moving towards it, in their goal to become an “artist”.

However, in the eyes of traditional artists whether this kind of work could be called “art” is still in doubt. Some artists worry that in the future people will become so dependent upon this tool, that they may eventually lose their ability to use oil colors to create the magic.

But even digital art still needs the training and skill used in traditional painting. Like some famous abstract artists, many digital artists are also capable of painting realistic depictions in oil.

Digital art is more than just computer skill, it is the integration of artistic talent and computer technology. Making a great painting in a digital format is as same as making it on the canvas, requiring the artist to have the same creative design, passion and skills; it can be seen as just another powerful tool to express yourself. A great painter/draftsman can use the same skills in the digital format, of course learning how transfer these skills to a computer is also essential.

For me, as an art graduate, although I use computer in my daily life and work, I still prefer to rely on my natural abilities to draw, design, and paint pictures. I still prefer to use my brush, knife and oil to make myself dirty in front of my easel for several hours or even days and weeks. I still enjoy the moment when the knife touches the canvas, and the satisfaction at the moment of the final touch.
About the author: Cherry Xu is an Art Design graduate, and a teacher and practitioner of traditional Chinese art. She works as the Director’s Assistant at Aspect Art Ltd

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

I produce illustrations both traditionally and digitally. I feel that you definitely do need "natural abilities" to illustrate digitally. All the rules of light, shadow, shape, composition, and so on still apply in the digital world. And every digital illustration I do still starts with a well thought out sketch. We all need to keep in mind that a computer is just another medium to use as paint is on canvas.

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

It always makes me laugh when people think that because you have used a computer as the medium for your artwork, the computer has painted it for you.

It is just another medium, the same as using acrylics, or pencil, or whatever.  As Mary Lee says, everything you need to know to create a successful piece of art in the digital world is the same as in the real world.

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

I agree with "not me" that painting digital is just another medium, and that you need the same basic skills no matter what medium you use.

Instead of being in front of the easel, spending time painting with brush and oil, pictures can be made using computer software and a mouse in only a few minutes.

This seems very wrong to me. Like any other medium, creating a great digital painting takes time and effort! Off course it is possible to create a digital picture in only a few minutes, but it's also possible to to do that with any other medium - and the results will show that the creator didn't put a lot of work into it.

I don't think artists will ever stop working with traditional mediums. That would be like not using a pencil anymore when we discovered that we could use paint and create something with beautiful colors.

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

do u guys think you need digital skills to succeed in illustration?

Anastasia
www.anastasiaC.blogspot.com

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

I don't think you NEED digital design skills to succeed as an illustrator. It's always good practice to explore all the mediums illustrators use to find the one (or more than one) that you can take farther. The world has develop into a computer dependent society. 75% of workplace communication is now taking place via email and the web as opposed to phones and conference calls. It's always good to be in the now and to remember to keep progressing your work ahead and learn, learn, learn. You are the only one that can make yourself a good illustrator...your paintbrush won't nor will the computer. Good Luck ac291.

Mary Lee
www.maryleeillustration.com

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

cherryxu wrote:

Instead of being in front of the easel, spending time painting with brush and oil, pictures can be made using computer software and a mouse in only a few minutes.

A few minutes? I wish!
I spend 8 hours a few days ago, just to color a piece. O_o

I do agree that computer makes a lot of things easier, for example: backups. When you mess up in paper or fabric, chances are that it will be noticeable (not always), even if it’s just to the "expert eye"... Praise "Undo"!!

Another good thing about computers is that you can recycle and reuse. If you make your backgrounds on a different layer, you could use them for a different piece. And for those who do vectorial illustration or animation, the possibilities are endless, you can save all kinds of objects and parts to reuse them, this saves a LOT of time.

Material wise, I think that computer art is a whole lot less expensive than traditional art, with all the technology you can imitate a bunch of different mediums, nowadays you can do quality (and digital) water paint, oil, pastels, chalk, ink, color pencils, etc.

Even so, I still like traditional art. So far there is something that computers cannot give us, and that's texture, physical texture. You could make a great impasto with a computer, but it won't feel like impasto... I don't know if that makes sense.

I don't know if this happens to me only, or if it is an issue that other artists have experienced, but I feel like drawing on a tablet is nothing like doing it on paper, I'm not sure if my hand is used to the paper resistance, or texture or even if it is the sync between eyes and hand, or the fact that you can turn and move it better, but I find that using the computer to draw is harder than using paper or fabric.

Sometimes I have the need to get dirty and sit in front of my easel, and some other times I want nothing to do with it... But, do we really have to choose?
When it comes to work I think that the best way to do it is to use both techniques, take the best out of each one and just go for it.

Sea Angel

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

Just thought I would jump in here and post my views. It hardly takes a few minutes to produce work digitaly on the computer. The only difference from being infront of the Easle is the lack of drying time. Controling a mouse or a Wacom tablet pen takes a lot of practice and if you are drawing from scratch via the computer you still need skill and creativity. It is simply another medium and with two kids at foot a wonderful way to escape without having your paint spilt all over.

www.senjula.com

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

Well, all I can add is, I certainly hope that I will not need digital skills to be an illustrator or "artist", because I have no clue how to do that stuff.....and at this point in my life, I don't have time to learn.  Perhaps someday.
  I definately don't think it will ever replace traditional art, because they are two entirely different mediums, and have an entirely different look to them.  I mostly draw in pencil because I am comfortable with that.  And I don't know of any computer art that can capture that same exact look.
  Both are valid forms of art, and I agree with Wynlen, in that if someone rushes a picture as opposed to spending time on it, you will be able to notice immediately, whether it's traditional or digital.

Fae

http://faeorainsart.blogspot.com/2006/0 … orget.html

10

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

Can't digital just be viewed as another medium? I'm sure people had similar anxieties and reservations when the camera or airbrushing was invented.

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

Moo wrote:

Can't digital just be viewed as another medium? I'm sure people had similar anxieties and reservations when the camera or airbrushing was invented.

It's funny how you mention that, only because my Art History class was just discussing this topic. When the invention of photography came about, a lot of artists were actually out of work. During that time, artists were used to document events. The "photograph" was simply another form of medium. At that time, everyone believed it was not art either.

I agree that digital art, is simply another tool to express a perspective of art.

Whenever there is a new tool invented, it always takes time for a person to accept the new change of that tool.

Everyone doesn't accept change at first, right?

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

I know this is an old thread but this issue has been bugging me recently. I do most of my art digitally. I paint in Photoshop. Recently some of my work was being juried for display in a local gallery. I was asked what process I used to create my images. When I said I use Photoshop there was a definately negative tone in the voice of the woman interviewing me. She wanted to know if I got the images from a computer, I didn't know what she meant at first. Yes, I created these images on a computer. No, I did not get these images from a computer. She assumed, as soon as she heard Photoshop, that I was using clipart!

I appreciate the process of traditional artists to lay paint to canvas. I know it is not easy and can take many months or longer to complete a painting. I just wish they would appriciate the digital process and not look down on it because they don't know computers and assume it is easy and cheating. I can not just click control B for insert briliance and instantly have a masterpiece.

OK...I'm done venting. thanks for listening.

Donna

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

Donna,

I do not know one illustrator who disapproves of digital media. I work 'analoge' and this works fine for me. It has nothing to do with making 'art' and that my work should therefore be crafted with techniques of the past. I do not work with the computer to make my images simply because the computer can't do what I want. Sure, software like Painter goed very far in mimicking paint-effects. But it does not do the trick for me. I do use the computer to scan my work and perform colour corrections on them, but always in a non-destructive way.
I've just been to a solo exhibition of a friend who also illustrates. He also uses the computer more and more these days. He made some very fine prints and put them up for display. Works great!
Use the medium of your choice. If this works for you keep exploring it. Do not worry too much if you are making art or not just because you work on a PC. Some of the finest illustrators today use a pc and achieve painterly effects with this tool.

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

I agree, dwolf2005, saying "digital" carries a stigma. I just had someone ask to buy a painting I did. Trouble is that the painting is virtual (ArtRage). I offered to have a giclee run of it but never heard back again. Oh well.

Also there is a mixed bag of reactions... an agent likes my work partially because it is digital but looks (mostly) like it isn't (which means hypothetically less rpocess time for color separations on the back end), but I had an art director tell me that I really should "get the feel" of paint before I went digital (like I hadn't painted with real paint for the last 30 years or anything). Part of why I like digital is because I don't have a lot of time. There is no cleanup, and you can work in 10 minute spurts if need be.

I also work in a mixture of digital and analog. I draw in pencil (sometimes I ink) scan and digitally paint in Photoshop. Sometimes I use Flash, sometimes I incorporate scanned bits of painted acryllic. Like any medium, you have to explore it. I'm having a lot of fun exploring this one.

15

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

I have a flash site
i'm looking for the script who makes google ads with flash.
can you give me the link?

16

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

I believe the true bare essence of traditional art will never dissappear for the simple fact that it physically comes from humans.Lets face it,it all began with an idea and a stroke of a pencil not a mouse pad.Man has been facinated with the ability to Create since the beginning of time NOT MODERN DAY TECHNOLOGY.I'm a strong believer that we should not ever let technology influence anyone in any way or dictate in any decision making in The Creative Process or daily life.Plus keep in mind most clients dont care how ya did it they care about how original and how well overall  the end product is presented.I value always the Creative Mind after all isn't it the most powerful tool known to man?

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

I don't think it really matters if your art is created with traditional or digital medium. Well, do people really look at art and the first thing they think is how it was created? Or do they think of how beautiful the art is?

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

You need traditional skills regardless. Both mediums co-exist in tandem. Think of digital media as another tool.

www.foliofox.com

19

Re: Traditional Art versus Digital Art

Reading all of this makes methink.... Are there any 'realists' left in the world? In the real world of business (which is what you are all trying to do, make money) the feasability of creating art is one of turnover versus time and when it comes to making something like a comic it is far more feasabile to do this on a computer.

This is because you can recreate repetative drawings such as characters or backrounds at the click of a button where as it could take someone hours or days to do it by hand. But if there is a one off painting or drawing you can get the same effects from a computer as you can from any physical material, using the correct software.

The only thing you can not get from a computer generated print is the texture... and with the advancements in technology (3D printers) this will soon be possible. every other form of art has been affected by computers such as movies, it is cheaper to create an actor than to hire one, it is cheaper to create explosions on a computer than to pay for explosives... the only thing that costs more is an animator as that needs to be added to create the illusion of personality. Unfortunatly fine art will soon follow so all you artists that are refusing to conform to the medium of digital art, be prepared to be looking for a new career in the future.

If you fail to prepare, than you should prepare to fail.